Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1  (Read 753 times)

Spectro

(V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« on: October 22, 2006, 06:26:11 am »
First Round
Mod: Liero 1.0 - Rifle Combo
Loading Time: 20%
Level: Lambda Bunker
Outcome: [Uw] Won

Second Round

Mod: Liero 1.0 - Limited
Loading Time: 100%
Level: LFR
Outcome: (V) Won

Final Round
Mod: 8-bit - Limited
Loading Time: 100%
Level: LFR
Outcome: (V) Won

Fun games with the exception of the first round on Lamda. It seems like whenever we have cw's, one team ends up choosing rifles on Lamda on their own server to get a free win. It's pretty lame (not directed to just Uw but to ourselves as well), so maybe we can come to a mutual agreement not to play anymore lamda rounds =D?

Note: During final round, Tizzle had to leave after he went out.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2006, 01:01:09 am by SpectrumFire »
Logged

Quake

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2006, 11:29:39 pm »
*Curses.
Logged
True religion is real living; living with all one's soul, with all one's goodness and righteousness.
- Albert Einstein

Purplehaze

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2006, 11:54:04 pm »
Nice work guys and gals.
Yeah, I've tried to steer clear from picking lamda, but you guys kinda got pwnd =o!
Logged
Like a boss.

Spectro

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2006, 04:02:56 am »
Nice work guys and gals.
Yeah, I've tried to steer clear from picking lamda, but you guys kinda got pwnd =o!


Had no choice since it was their sett. Personally, it's kinda ridiculous when you walk slightly forward to pwn somebody and you end up killing yourself while your prey still lives. I'd say we did great considering. If they played even smarter, I don't think I would have had half the kills. Same would probably go for Blaze and Tizz too. In fact Blaze probably had even more distance lag living on the other side of the continent, so she did better than me if you throw that into the picture =D
Logged

Purplehaze

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2006, 09:22:16 pm »
Ah ok. Maybe (V) should practice lamda in lag?
Logged
Like a boss.

Spectro

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2006, 12:07:48 am »
Have fun, Spectro </3's lamda. I'll always be open for use as a semi-intelligent punchingbag though.
Logged

Quake

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2006, 02:04:49 am »
Why would you cancel Lamda because you dont like it? You pwn at almost everything anyways spectro. And you know we have people that can pwn in each setting.
Logged
True religion is real living; living with all one's soul, with all one's goodness and righteousness.
- Albert Einstein

Spectro

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2006, 04:23:30 am »
Why would you cancel Lamda because you dont like it? You pwn at almost everything anyways spectro. And you know we have people that can pwn in each setting.

You totally didn't get it. Reread plx =D
Logged

Cloud

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2006, 05:03:22 am »
Fun games with the exception of the first round on Lamda. It seems like whenever we have cw's, one team ends up choosing rifles on Lamda on their own server to get a free win. It's pretty lame (not directed to just Uw but to ourselves as well), so maybe we can come to a mutual agreement not to play anymore lamda rounds =D?

Most of our home settings, are rifles, and a good majority of them are in lamda, we use them alot because we know that is probably one of the few settings we are guaranteed to win, and winning ofcourse is the most important, thing?

But oh noo...another clan used our advantage agasint us, and now lets not allow it anymore(find something new, maybe haze's idea on practising a mod noone has ever heard off, then using it agaisnt other clans, hehe so smart) ....

I still don't understand how the first lamda game wasn't fun..oh wait..cause we lost, silly me, but don't worry all the other ones were fun, because we won. :)

What am I trying to get at is don't expect to win every game, and don't make excuses on why you lost. You lost in lamda because they outplayed you, just like we outplayed many other clans in lamda or w/e other setting.

Maybe it's just me, or maybe my brain is just imagining things, but us, (V) seems like we would do anything to win..pick any setting, give our opponents the most unfairest chance, and it disgusts me.

ps : I couldn't keep what I am feeling inside of me, inside anymore, hope you understand ;).

Quake

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2006, 05:08:31 am »
Yeah agreed... Expecially since lag is sooooo eays in lamda. :p
Logged
True religion is real living; living with all one's soul, with all one's goodness and righteousness.
- Albert Einstein

Adam

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2006, 08:57:52 am »
Fun games with the exception of the first round on Lamda. It seems like whenever we have cw's, one team ends up choosing rifles on Lamda on their own server to get a free win. It's pretty lame (not directed to just Uw but to ourselves as well), so maybe we can come to a mutual agreement not to play anymore lamda rounds =D?

Most of our home settings, are rifles, and a good majority of them are in lamda, we use them alot because we know that is probably one of the few settings we are guaranteed to win, and winning ofcourse is the most important, thing?

But oh noo...another clan used our advantage agasint us, and now lets not allow it anymore(find something new, maybe haze's idea on practising a mod noone has ever heard off, then using it agaisnt other clans, hehe so smart) ....

I still don't understand how the first lamda game wasn't fun..oh wait..cause we lost, silly me, but don't worry all the other ones were fun, because we won. :)

What am I trying to get at is don't expect to win every game, and don't make excuses on why you lost. You lost in lamda because they outplayed you, just like we outplayed many other clans in lamda or w/e other setting.

Maybe it's just me, or maybe my brain is just imagining things, but us, (V) seems like we would do anything to win..pick any setting, give our opponents the most unfairest chance, and it disgusts me.

ps : I couldn't keep what I am feeling inside of me, inside anymore, hope you understand ;).

Beautiful words :)
Logged
Quote from: Asrack
I missed inturpreted that wrong than.
Gezz.

Spectro

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2006, 01:29:18 am »
Fun games with the exception of the first round on Lamda. It seems like whenever we have cw's, one team ends up choosing rifles on Lamda on their own server to get a free win. It's pretty lame (not directed to just Uw but to ourselves as well), so maybe we can come to a mutual agreement not to play anymore lamda rounds =D?

Most of our home settings, are rifles, and a good majority of them are in lamda, we use them alot because we know that is probably one of the few settings we are guaranteed to win, and winning ofcourse is the most important, thing?

But oh noo...another clan used our advantage agasint us, and now lets not allow it anymore(find something new, maybe haze's idea on practising a mod noone has ever heard off, then using it agaisnt other clans, hehe so smart) ....

I still don't understand how the first lamda game wasn't fun..oh wait..cause we lost, silly me, but don't worry all the other ones were fun, because we won. :)

What am I trying to get at is don't expect to win every game, and don't make excuses on why you lost. You lost in lamda because they outplayed you, just like we outplayed many other clans in lamda or w/e other setting.

Maybe it's just me, or maybe my brain is just imagining things, but us, (V) seems like we would do anything to win..pick any setting, give our opponents the most unfairest chance, and it disgusts me.

ps : I couldn't keep what I am feeling inside of me, inside anymore, hope you understand ;).

I understand where you are coming from because that's exactly what I don't want to happen and exactly what the agreement would help establish. I personally don't want to play lamda on our servers against Uw anymore because it's obvious that they get as frustrated as we do in their server playing lamda. Looking through our clanwar history (even dating back into LcD), our lamda rounds weren't argumented only if we won. What the hell is that. It's exactly the bullshit you're against, Coud, and exactly the bullshit I'm trying to get rid of. Don't take it for somthing it's not, because my main point is trying to avoid frustration in a game that should be fun for everyone whether loss or win. I hope there's less of a misunderstanding now. <3 ya Cloud.

Also, since (V) is a democracy, I'd like to ask everyone if they agree with stopping lamda rounds with Uw. It's absolutely okay if you don't, but I'd also ask that anyone who diagrees with it will never take out their frustration on the other team. It would be unsportsmanlike, and relatively lame if you put yourself in the situation to begin with =D
Logged

Purplehaze

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2006, 01:37:07 am »
I agree to that, as long as they can't play lamda against us either.
Logged
Like a boss.

Spectro

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2006, 02:49:14 am »
I agree to that, as long as they can't play lamda against us either.

And that's exactly where the mutual agreement would come into play. It's smarter to go into the situation with a full clan decision, and not just an impulse from one of its leaders.
Logged

Quake

Re: (V) vs. [Uw] 2:1
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2006, 04:59:53 am »
Wow.. thats ridiculous...

I have played Uw in my server and theres on lamda without any complaining. So maybe its you.. Like, I dont get it.. Why is it a topic of discussion? Oh no. It lagged. We've played laggy games before where people have *****ed, whined, and threw temper tantrums. We aren't going to stop playing those settings though are we?

You said you didnt want to play lamda against Uw anymore because you thought there was both too much whining. It takes 2 to argue. Meaning you must have mentioned lag too. Its a setting... no ones cheating. If you aren't good at lag on lamda.. then YOU shouldn't play. I don't see why it has to apply to the rest of the clan.. Personally, I will play Uw anytime. Both rounds in their server..

Edit:

PS -

Also, since (V) is a democracy, I'd like to ask everyone if they agree with stopping lamda rounds with Uw. It's absolutely okay if you don't, but I'd also ask that anyone who diagrees with it will never take out their frustration on the other team. It would be unsportsmanlike, and relatively lame if you put yourself in the situation to begin with =D

Why would that be with just "1" setting and "1" clan? That is complete ... you know what.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2006, 05:05:39 am by Magus »
Logged
True religion is real living; living with all one's soul, with all one's goodness and righteousness.
- Albert Einstein
Pages: [1]   Go Up